"If you are wondering why Americans are losing the wars on cancer, heart disease and diabetes, you might look at the funding sources of the major public health groups," Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman write. "Big corporations dump big money into these groups. And pretty soon, the groups start taking the line of the big corporations. Case in point: the American Diabetes Association(ADA). Earlier this month, the ADA cut a deal with candy and soda pop maker Cadbury Schweppes. Here's the deal - Cadbury Schweppes kicks in a couple million dollars to the ADA. In return, the company gets to use the ADA label on its diet drinks - plus the positive publicity generated by the deal. Cadbury makes Dr. Pepper and such nutritious treats as Cadbury's Cream Egg. You would have to have your head buried deeply in the sand to deny that sugar-filled soda is fueling childhood obesity - which in turn in is fueling type 2 diabetes." In an interview with the Corporate Crime Reporter, ADA's Richard Kahn emphasized that the ADA logo would only appear on "products that are better to eat."In its coverage, the Adrants weblog wrote, "While we don't pretend to be a medical expert, we've certainly heard sugar has a little something to do with a disease called Diabetes." This comment generated an interesting debate in the Adrants comments section, about the scientific evidence linking sugar intake to diabetes, and about the propriety of the ADA's decision to accept the money in any case. The PR Watch editorial above is actually careful with its scientific claim. It doesn't just argue sugar --> diabetes, it argues sugar --> obesity --> diabetes. The Adrants comments point out that in this perhaps overly cautious formulation, one could equally argue TV --> obesity --> diabetes. And yet, I'm inclined to agree with both Adrants and PR Watch that it seems unnecessarily mercenary for a public health organization concerned with a malfunction of the body's ability to regulate sugar, for which the scientific facts are not yet settled, to take millions from a soda manufacturer in a deal that implies ADA endorsement of its products.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(255)
-
▼
May
(27)
- Obesity and economics: BMI influences family incom...
- What do Supreme Court justices know about nutrition?
- Behind the Apron: The Current State of School Nutr...
- Supreme Court rules in favor of beef commodity che...
- Cadbury Schweppes reaches deal with American Diabe...
- "50 things every foodie should do"
- The voice in the wilderness...
- Multilingual "government speech": el cerdo es bueno
- The nutrition message in beef, pork, and dairy che...
- Economic Justification for the Dietary Guidelines ...
- Federal Communication About Obesity in the Dietary...
- Where to get food stamp, WIC, and child nutrition ...
- First, I'd like to thank my supportive family....
- Welcome Fast Food News
- Detroit's fat tax proposal
- Wrapping up on obesity revisionism
- Fuddruckers nutrition games
- Welcome Bitter Greens Journal
- If agricultural economists yelled,...
- MyPyramid cartoon: "I'm confused"
- University of Baltimore's Obesity Scorecard for th...
- Chicago Tribune's Andrew Martin on USDA subsidies
- AAEA Food Safety and Nutrition Section
- Sunday sermonettes from Effect Measure
- Thomas Jefferson on food
- Seeing pizza slices in the new My Pyramid
- More MyPyramid cartoons
-
▼
May
(27)
Sunday, May 22, 2005
Cadbury Schweppes reaches deal with American Diabetes Association
The news summary and editorial from PR Watch:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Partner Links
International Education Exchange,
Vacation and Travel,
College of the Desert,
Internet Radio Broadcasting,
Interactive Marketing,
Television Guide,
Canola Oil,
Political Science,
Study Guides,
Business Organization,
Political and Business,
Business & Industrial,
Children Theater,
Health News,
Film School,
Business and Advertising,
Medical Health Information,
Meditation Techniques,
American College of Physician Executives
0 comments:
Post a Comment