Rebuttal welcome.In recent months the major food companies have been trying hard to convince Americans that they feel the pain of our expanding waistlines, especially when it comes to kids. Kraft announced it would no longer market Oreos to younger children, McDonald's promoted itself as a salad producer and Coca-Cola said it won't advertise to kids under 12. But behind the scenes it's hardball as usual, with the junk food giants pushing the Bush Administration to defend their interests. The recent conflict over what America eats, and the way the government promotes food, is a disturbing example of how in Bush's America corporate interests trump public health, public opinion and plain old common sense.
The latest salvo in the war on added sugar and fat came July 14- 15, when the Federal Trade Commission held hearings on childhood obesity and food marketing. Despite the fanfare, industry had no cause for concern; FTC chair Deborah Majoras had declared beforehand that the commission will do absolutely nothing to stop the rising flood of junk food advertising to children. In June the Department of Agriculture denied a request from our group Commercial Alert to enforce existing rules forbidding mealtime sales in school cafeterias of "foods of minimal nutritional value"--i.e., junk foods and soda pop. The department admitted that it didn't know whether schools are complying with the rules, but, frankly, it doesn't give a damn. "At this time, we do not intend to undertake the activities or measures recommended in your petition," wrote Stanley Garnett, head of the USDA's Child Nutrition Division.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(255)
-
▼
September
(35)
- New study on FDA website casts doubt on qualified ...
- The 23rd post meme: "What is the government speech?"
- Child nutrition programs around the world
- Post Hurricane Katrina statement on budget and nut...
- FDA chief Lester Crawford resigns suddenly
- Environmental regulation of agriculture
- National Association of Farmers' Market Nutrition ...
- Ed Olsen, housing, and New Orleans
- NYT: In Niger, Hungry are Fed, but Farmers May Starve
- Balance in the Tufts Daily News: Is Soda the New T...
- Help get junk food out of Massachusetts schools
- Posters for McDonald's and childhood obesity
- Steven Block awarded Seers Prize
- What's the story?
- How far has your food traveled?
- Dean's letter for Tufts Nutrition
- Debating agricultural subsidies and nutrition
- Information sources for community food security
- The political economy of food stamps
- Chris Mooney: The Republican War on Science
- Why not stop junk food advertisements to children?
- San Francisco Examiner used restaurant reviews to ...
- Obesity and preschoolers
- Ruskin and Schor: Who's to Blame for Childhood Obe...
- Labor conditions for California's farm workers
- What's the harm in promoting dairy weight loss?
- Charlotte's Web
- New USDA report supports controversial dairy weigh...
- Children's nutrition and competitive foods in schools
- Monsanto's fan mail for Bitter Greens Journal
- Federal food assistance programs during the disaster
- Katrina
- Welcome Fuddruckers customers!
- American Dietetic Association (ADA) and dairy weig...
- Katrina
-
▼
September
(35)
Monday, September 12, 2005
Ruskin and Schor: Who's to Blame for Childhood Obesity?
From Gary Ruskin and Juliet Schor's recent article in The Nation:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Partner Links
International Education Exchange,
Vacation and Travel,
College of the Desert,
Internet Radio Broadcasting,
Interactive Marketing,
Television Guide,
Canola Oil,
Political Science,
Study Guides,
Business Organization,
Political and Business,
Business & Industrial,
Children Theater,
Health News,
Film School,
Business and Advertising,
Medical Health Information,
Meditation Techniques,
American College of Physician Executives
0 comments:
Post a Comment