When Congress returns from break, lawmakers will turn their attention to passing the laws that implement broad program cuts -- including cuts to social programs -- stipulated in the budget resolution this Spring. Medicaid may lose billions (relative to its baseline projected growth due to caseload and medical costs). Food stamps are threatened to a somewhat smaller degree: $3 billion over five years are to be cut from the budget area that includes both food stamps and farm programs. Perhaps $2.4 billion will be cut from farm programs and $600,000 from food stamps (see Jonathan Weisman in the Washington Post yesterday).
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has good background reporting making the case that food assistance programs reduce hunger and bolster nutrition. In other recently updated reports, the Center on Budget warns about specific proposals on the table, including one for a five-state block grant, and another that would permit more flexible waivers (administrative decisions that grant states authority to experiment with program rules and design). The authors of the latter report argue that new "superwaivers" are dangerous, because USDA's Food and Nutrition Service already has sufficient authority to permit state waivers for some kinds of policy initiatives, which allow innovations without threatening the welfare of program participants. The Center's strength is explaining arcane policy debates like these, the better to protect low-income Americans from dangerous daggers buried in thickets of legislation. Still, whether with "superwaivers" or without, I would like to see more ambitious food stamp policy innovations that seek to improve the program's nutritional effectiveness, make clearer that the program does not provide an incentive for overconsumption of food for particular subpopulations, and improve the program's flexibility for participants.
If you would like to contact your legislator to express a view about food stamp cuts, see the food stamp action pages on the websites of the Coalition on Human Needs and the Food Research and Action Center.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(255)
-
▼
August
(21)
- Kroc-style: dog eat dog, rat eat rat
- Judge approves McDonald's trans fat ruling
- Congressional action to cut social programs
- The end of the August Eat Local Challenge
- One difference between Quiznos and Subway
- National Academies recommend improvements to food ...
- Upcoming events: Consumer Federation of America an...
- The Chicago Tribune covers the Oreo
- Informed Eating covers food marketing to children
- Teenage boys consume 160 pounds of sweeteners per ...
- The burdens of modern life
- What would Stigler say about the cost of a healthy...
- Healthy fast food not selling well
- Pepsi's Tropicana Peach Papaya with no peach and n...
- Red Tomato: domestic fair trade produce
- What's in the foods you eat?
- A new Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition
- George Will: treat farm animals well
- The 'Eat Local' challenge for August
- The effect of food stamps on food security
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organi...
-
▼
August
(21)
Monday, August 29, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Partner Links
International Education Exchange,
Vacation and Travel,
College of the Desert,
Internet Radio Broadcasting,
Interactive Marketing,
Television Guide,
Canola Oil,
Political Science,
Study Guides,
Business Organization,
Political and Business,
Business & Industrial,
Children Theater,
Health News,
Film School,
Business and Advertising,
Medical Health Information,
Meditation Techniques,
American College of Physician Executives
0 comments:
Post a Comment