Nothing makes a geeky food policy student like me more excited than seeing the NYTimes writing about cross-price elasticities of demand, except that they didn't actually use the technical term for it. The cross price elasticity of demand, or the change in demand for one food when the price of another changes, is a formula for calculating the response consumers will have to changing food prices. For example, suppose the price of corn syrup goes up 1 percent, so people buy less corn syrup and more of other stuff-- the cross-price elasticity for fruit would show the percentage increase in fruit spending in response to the higher corn syrup price.
In light of the recent surge in global prices of food, especially grains and meat, Wednesday's NYTimes article is about the light that some healthy and local food advocates see at the end of the global food "crisis" tunnel. So their theory goes: If the price of products produced with large quantities of corn, like corn syrup and grain-fed meat increase drastically--which is already beginning to happen--then people will switch to eating more fruits and vegetables and more locally grown food that doesn't require as much fossil fuel to transport it to the grocery store.
While this phenomenon may be true for some, it may take more than rising prices for consumers to change their behavior. One of the factors affecting this response is the degree to which food A, fruit for example--is a complement or a substitute for food B, corn syrup in this example. One can use cross elasticities to show how much the price of corn syrup would have to go up in order for consumers to "demand" more fruit.
Of course the response also depends on how much prices continue to rise, whether fruit and vegetable prices continue to rise less than those of other foods, and if farmers change their production decisions for the coming year. But I wonder if substitution to healthier or more sustainable foods will actually happen on a large scale, or if we, and our food companies, will just figure out shortcuts to our favorite processed flavors. We also should remember what a small percentage the price of corn represents in the price of corn flakes- in other words, most of the cost of processed foods is for value-added in production, marketing and distribution, not the raw ingredients themselves.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(351)
-
▼
April
(29)
- Secretary Schafer
- Tapas: Egg quail on Sobrassada Toast
- Bacalao al Pil Pil - Pil Pil Codfish
- Going to Barcelona
- Pork Feet and Snails with Hot Sauce
- What are you calling a food desert?
- Sant Jordi - A beautiful Catalan tradition
- Kidada for Disney Couture
- Nicole Richie's New Style
- U.S. Food Policy TV (episode 3): Interview with Ma...
- Love Potion # 10! - Event. Week's diet recipes
- Head bands
- Model Of the Day
- New York City
- Fricandó - An Autumn dish in Spring time
- Floral Prints and Bright Colors!
- ETRO
- Tomorrow is Today: I'm on Diet!!!
- WIC messages: "Touching Hearts, Touching Minds"
- Veal's Tongue in Vinaigrette Sauce
- Foodlinks America reports on unspent commodity funds
- Michigan food stamps twice monthly?
- Stuff it!!! Codfish in Piquillo Peppers
- ♫ Chocolate and Nuts Stave ♪ - Event
- Garbanzos con Chorizo
- Will global food prices keep us healthy?
- Rabbit & Noodles Casserole
- And on a related topic, is HFCS "natural"?
- Cazón Sailor-Style
-
▼
April
(29)
Friday, April 4, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Partner Links
International Education Exchange,
Vacation and Travel,
College of the Desert,
Internet Radio Broadcasting,
Interactive Marketing,
Television Guide,
Canola Oil,
Political Science,
Study Guides,
Business Organization,
Political and Business,
Business & Industrial,
Children Theater,
Health News,
Film School,
Business and Advertising,
Medical Health Information,
Meditation Techniques,
American College of Physician Executives
0 comments:
Post a Comment